Note to NeverTrumps: Trump's Character Is Admirable

January 5, 2018
By Karin McQuillan

As more and more people who hate Trump are forced to admit his achievements as president, they are doubling down on character assassination.  Even Trump voters often preface their satisfaction with Trump's actions by criticizing his tweets or his personality.

Here's an alternate take on things: Trump's character is responsible for his outstanding performance in his first year as president.  If you want to know who someone is, you look at what he does.  What we have: a booming economy, growing jobs, more lawful governance, fewer regulations, more global security.  What character traits this took: hard work, focus, commitment, courage, honesty, independence, incorruptibility, self-confidence, love of excellence.  The list of Trump's positive character traits goes on and on.  You don't get achievements independent of character.

Here's another alternate approach: there's no need to point out that George Washington is a dead white male when you praise him as the father of our country.  Who cares that Churchill drank too much when you are discussing his leadership in the fight against Hitler?  We all understand perfectly well that we are all human, meaning we have faults.  We don't need to apologize for President Trump.
I think Trump's character is excellent.

Trump's integrity in office is outstanding – the first politician in my memory who is sticking to his promises to voters.  We are hugely benefiting from his promise-keeping.

His primary promise was to focus on jobs.  Wow, has he delivered.  Jobless claims have dropped to the lowest level in 44 years – last seen in 1973, under Nixon.  Record-breaking low unemployment in 13 states.  Investment reinvigorating the Rust Belt.  More high-paying jobs in mining, oil, and industry – another promise kept, as President Trump has unleashed the energy sector and boosted capital investment.

Lazy, leftist, passive President Obama lectured us to accept the new normal of a stagnant economy, which was what his policies delivered.  GDP growth was 1.6 percent in 2016.

Passivity and defeatism are not in Trump's nature.  He is a fighter who thinks big.  He believes in free enterprise in his gut, because he is himself a go-getter.  He thought big for the American economy, because he believes in Americans.  Trump likes to say he completed his projects on time and under budget.  It was a matter of pride for him.  Pride can be a good thing.  Trump was scoffed at as a braggart and buffoon for promising 3-percent growth.  He has already over-delivered.

The unemployment gap between blacks and whites has fallen to a record low.  Trump promised the black community a better life in a better economy, and he has come through.
Unemployment for hispanic Americans is the lowest in history.  Another promise kept, as our hispanic citizens have benefited from Trump enforcing our border laws and driving farm wages up.

Leftists are trying to credit the 2017 economic boom to Obama.  Good luck with that.  Trump boosted the economy through vigorous action: cutting regs, boosting the energy sector, restoring business confidence, dramatic corporate tax cuts, bringing back investments from overseas, and cutting job competition from illegal aliens.  We now have a tight labor market, and wages are rising.

Yes, for much of the year, Trump was doing a lot of jaw-boning and executive actions, with no legislative back-up.  That's the trait called leadership.

These economic achievements came from President Trump's character strengths.  He is a high-focus, driven bulldozer of a man who gets things done.  He's a practical man.  He's a hard worker.  These are not sophisticated or cultured or warm, fuzzy traits; they are traits of a strong man.  We have forgotten to honor masculinity in our culture.

President Trump did more than any president in history in his first year to relieve the regulatory burden on Americans.  Complying with useless government regulations costs the economy $2 trillion a year, or 21% of the average payroll per American company.  Estimates are that the Obama regs slowed the economy by 0.8%.  Trump's regulatory cuts, in which his administration removed 22 outdated regulations for each new one, is a big part of his doubling our economic growth in one year.

What did it take to cut the size of government and unleash the power of capitalism in this way?  It was motivated not by conservative principles of small government.  It was based in Trump's character.  He is one hundred percent practical.  He has a strong sense of fairness.  He is fearless.  He thrives on opposition.  He has incredible guts and stubbornness, necessary to take on the federal bureaucracy.  He doesn't give in when opponents fight dirty, and boy, does the Deep State fight dirty.  He is not scared of the media's attacks on him as a monster destroying the planet and abandoning the poor.

He is a creative and master fighter, as we see in the his effective use of tweets and branding to encourage his supporters and sow confusion among the enemy.

Trump is characteristically unsuited to kowtow to the Deep State or to follow its methods.  He does not flout the law in darkness, like the underhanded Barack Obama.  Obama's DOJ and EPA created secret and illegal slush funds.  The Democrat DOJ blackmailed the industries it was regulating in order to provide half a billion dollars to left-wing groups.  The EPA used phony sue-and-settle tactics to hand undemocratic power to privileged leftist groups.
In sharp contrast, Trump is not a sneak.  He respects the rule of law.  He honors the presidency.  He is open and forthright.  His administration has turned the DOJ and EPA back to following the laws as written.

Obama was an unhealthy narcissist who had never accomplished anything in the real world, yet he boasted that he knew more about every topic than his top advisers.  There is a business saying that A players hire A players, while B players hire C players.  The mediocre surround themselves with lesser mediocrities.  Obama undoubtedly did know more about foreign affairs than his right-hand national security adviser, Ben Rhodes, a speechwriter with a degree in creative writing.

Trump is different.  He is genuinely confident in himself.  You can tell because he is not afraid of being surrounded by top experts.  He expects them to know far more in their fields than he does.  Trump's pride makes him seek excellence in others.  He has created an impressive Cabinet and White House staff of brilliant achievers.  You don't get effective results on the economy and foreign affairs without a high-quality leader.

The importance of character to effectiveness cannot be overstated.  Trump has other character traits of achievers.  He is not discouraged by failures and mistakes; he learns from them.  He doesn't just set goals; he follows up on results.  He faces reality.

Trump does not see Americans in different categories.  He cares about all Americans, black, white and brown; rich, middle-class, and poor; city-dwellers and country-dwellers; New York sophisticates and Evangelicals.  He values freedom and prosperity for himself and for the rest of us.  He wants to do what is best for the country, not what is best for only some identity groups or some regions at the expense of others, as in Obama and Hillary's zero- sum game of identity politics.

We barely survived eight years of a bigot in the White House: the resentful, racially obsessed President Obama, who disliked Evangelicals, rural Americans, working-class whites, white small businessmen, and Jews.  At home, Obama purposefully stirred up racial hatred and violence for political gain.  Abroad, Obama tried to hand over the Middle East to the Muslim Brotherhood and facilitate nuclear weapons for the mullahs as payback to America.  Obama's race-baiting led to Americans dying – assassinations of our men in blue and innocent black victims of the resulting crime spree.  He chose to destabilize Iraq, Syria, Egypt, and Libya, setting off an unprecedented war on Christians and a Muslim migrant invasion of Europe.  Maybe I missed it, but I don't remember NeverTrumps criticizing Obama on character flaws.

Obama's fantasist efforts to reduce American power and prestige, born of his anti-colonialist anger and resentment, were passed off to us as idealism and humanity.  Obama had a weird Marxist mother who raised him to despise America, and he saw his father only once.  He was an unhappy child, a confused teenager, and an angry, isolated college student filled with contempt for white people other than his fellow Marxists.  Then he went to Harvard finishing school and became a secretive politician who never trusted himself to speak in public without a teleprompter.  His false front hid a schemer and hater.

Unlike our last president, President Trump is who he is.  What you see is what you get.  His candor is blunt and refreshing.  He is not an ideologue, not a secret schemer, not a race-baiter, not a bitter person seeking payback.  Trump had a close, loving relationship with his father.  He has similar relationships with his own children.  He is a happy warrior.

Trump is honest in another sense, also: he is not corrupt.  Indeed, he seems incorruptible.  Trump does not sell himself to certain industries or lobbying groups (think the Clinton Foundation; think Obama's wasting the trillion-dollar economic stimulus on Solyndra green schemes and payoffs to Democrat voting blocs).  President Trump is a unique politician – a free man.

There's another set of admirable traits responsible for Trump's economic achievements.  Trump is a warm, extroverted braggart, not a cold, withdrawn narcissist like Obama or a self-serving, power-hungry narcissist like Hillary Clinton.  Although self-centered, Trump actually notices and cares about other people.  His voters are real people to him, as he is real to them.

Trump has softer, heart-centered virtues.  His priority on growing the economy and job promotion comes from his love of ordinary people, working-class people of all colors and all regions, whom he sees as real human beings and treats with respect.  What a relief after the cold and contemptuous President Obama, who cared about power, not people.  Trump's compassion and insight into working people's lives are wonderful character traits, shared by few in his class.

The president is also our commander in chief.  How has Trump's character served him in this role?
Trump's love of country and patriotism are dominant character traits.  Trump thinks for himself instead of accepting stale, outworn policies that are politically safe to espouse but dangerous to our country.  Trump has no time at all for pretense about our national security.  These are unusual character traits, different aspects of being a strong man.
Trump's personal qualities have resulted in the defeat of ISIS, our improved relations with the Saudis (now on board fighting terrorism and cooperating with Israel), restoration of our warm alliance with Israel, decertifying the odious Iran deal, and supporting the Iranian demonstrators against the mullahs.   European countries are finally paying their NATO dues, illegal aliens invading our country are being stopped at the border, the H-1B visa system is being applied lawfully to protect American jobs, and terrorists are no longer welcome into the country.  Trump is in the process of bullying the Chinese and the U.N. and South Korea into more effective action against North Korea, resulting last week, for example, in the confiscation of tankers breaking the oil embargo.  Pace Bret Stephens, the ability to bully opponents is something you want in a president.

Thanks to his fearless and clear-sighted character, we finally have a president who will not allow North Korea or Iran to have nuclear weapons.  Those of us who see that this is vital for national security are deeply grateful to have a strong president.

Trump has an abundance of character strengths as a tough guy – he is brave, he is assertive, he is an experienced fighter, and he always goes on offense.  He uses punishments and threats and intimidation, as well as cooperation and rewards, to get things done, because that is what it takes to win, and he wants to win.  He is unpredictable and keeps his opponents off balance.  He is impervious to their outrage.  He is a fierce fighter against all who attack him or his family or his country.

NeverTrumps are allergic to Trump's aggressive masculinity.  This is not a matter of hating his style.  They honestly see the man as evil.  His commonsense thinking, bold methods, and blunt personality are toxic to them – never smart, never constructive, never heroic, never associated with his achievements.  They are so blinded by their own hatred that they see Trump as a dangerous monster.  They accept outright lies and miss the real man entirely.

In a mere 800-word column, Bret Stephens, conservative columnist for the New York Times, managed to call Trump, in Stephens's own words, a lying, bullying, bigoted, ignorant, crass, petty, paranoid incompetent; a disgrace; an intemperate, dishonest demagogue who requires debased toadyism from his White House and Cabinet; a man who humiliates, denigrates, and insults his own officers and agencies, who is comparable to Juan Perón and Hugo Chávez and a deviant.  Stephen talks of the irremediable "stain of [Trump's] person," Trump's violence, his cult of strength (as in dictatorship), his disdain for truth, his hostility toward high culture, his conspiratorial thinking, and his white identity politics.

In the midst of the hysterical name-calling, Stephens doesn't point to a single bigoted word or action by Trump.  He can't.  There is none.  The accusations are partisan nonsense.  In Stephens's alternate universe, Trump's evident competence, his love, respect, and commitment to help his fellow Americans, goes invisible, and we are left with a racist, fascist caricature born of leftist agitprop.

Bret Stephens and his fellow NeverTrump elitists remind me of the British aristocracy in the 18th century.  These rich, powerful do-nothings monopolized political power and contemptuously demeaned the merchants, financiers, and industrialists who were making their country (and them) rich, powerful, and safe while improving ordinary peoples' lives – but their manners were ill bred!  They worked for a living.  They hadn't gone to the right schools.  Not suited for polite society.

It is a sorry reflection on our polite society that they are having conniption fits over Trump's character.  They want to divide the man from his achievements, just as they successfully divided Obama from his failures.  Can they succeed in besmirching Trump's character as they succeeded in sanitizing Obama's?  Their megaphone is large, and their self-interest in supporting the status quo ante is strong.  They have a ready-built audience.  They have enlisted enemies within our own Republican camp.

We have Trump.  We are winning.

American Thinker

Donald J Trump - 'Our Movement Speech' 2016 Presidential Race

Just a reminder about the Comey firing.

President Trump’s 360 Degree Adversaries, and He’s Got Them Surrounded…

Before Donald Trump won the presidency we accepted his approach. Trump enters a battle-space, any battle-space, with adversaries 360° around him; and yet somehow he has them surrounded. As President Trump, this approach continues.

On a scale of 1 to 10 the average person has a sense of internal purpose around level four. People of intense historic consequence generally exhibit a stronger personal drive which pushes their scaled sense of purpose to around a seven.  However, Donald Trump, now President Trump, as exhibited throughout his life’s accomplishments, carries a sense of purpose considerably higher – perhaps the highest in our life time.



During the phase of the industrial revolution the highest captains of Main Street industry were known as “Titans”. The economic Titans accomplished incredible achievements in building and industry.
These giants moved the nation forward. Relentless forward progress. They never stopped moving forward and they carried a resolve so severe they never allowed anything to stand in the way of their purpose driven objectives. National politicians knelt at the desks of these nationalist Titans.
With that established, Wolfmoon1776 provides an explainer:

“Well, I don’t really have to do any holding together, now that I figured out what Trump is up to. He is shaking things out, but counting on Trump gravity to pull things back together as he moves along.

He is moving “forward” at speeds Obama could not even dream of.

You and I will be anti-Trump trolls one day and MAGA heroes the next. Get used to it. Trump speed is the new normal. Some will call it flip-flopping, but that’s not what it is. Trump is dodging and weaving through reality faster than the reality can react to disrupt his plans.

I was explaining this to my wife. This is a roller-coaster now. Trump is no longer waiting for people to keep up. He is taking his bewildering art-of-the-deal campaign schtick into geopolitics, and for a lot of people who can’t keep up or hold on, it will be a rough ride.

Trump is no longer playing only with evil and cunning players who are still predictable, easily beatable dopes, like Hillary. He is playing against killers, with his own team of killers, and all the while he has scheming creeps like Hillary, BGI, SPLC, and the neocons gunning for him. Snake Ryan ready to bite when nobody is looking. “Warhead” McCain screaming for Russian blood. Psycho Kim and Samoa Obama plotting some kind of intrigue to take him down. And THOSE are the lightweights.

This is the majors now. Trump has to outwit world-class adversaries and “frenemies” by defining the deals that they will agree to. One minute they will think Trump is their friend – the next minute, a cunning, bitter foe.

And he has to do this with evil cheerleaders like Warhead, Linderace, Dipsy Dowd, Maggie Haterman, and Fake Yapper trashing him or praising him alternately, no matter which way he goes. They can’t keep up, either.

Neither can many around him. I think that half of the problem with advisers crashing into each other is they don’t realize what Trump is doing.

And people will trash you, and they will trash me. Get used to it. I’ve already caught plenty of people mocking me. Well, just wait a week in Trump time. Look stupid and conned by Trump one minute, and you look like a sage three days later.

Trump will not find perfect solutions. He will find OPTIMAL solutions. We cannot ask for more. Trump has stood by and watched Perfect murder Good for 8 years – maybe longer. He’s not gonna do it. He’s going to deliver the best outcome possible, and he’s not waiting for us to feel relaxed about it.

Best presidency ever! Just hang on. More winning is coming, but a lot of people are going to scream that it’s all over at EVERY turn.

The best way through this is to define viewpoints, not people, because people will shift as they change position and velocity in Trump gravity. Bash the neocon, warmonger, and dopey globalist positions – not the people who are going to hold them one moment and come loose from them later.

Trump is Jupiter moving through the asteroid belt. He is going to pull people into his orbit. A few will get slung off into space, but most will come along for the ride of their lives.

I am ON the Trump Train for good, even if I scream that I want off and can’t take it.

In the end, I only want to scream “TOO MUCH WINNING!!!”  (link)

….”And we will win, and you will win, and we will keep on winning… Believe me. And we will win so much, you will get tired of winning; and you will say: please Mr. Trump, we can’t take all of this winning… And I will say to you, NO. …We will win more, and we will keep winning,.. and we will win, and we will keep on winning…. I love you”…

~ President Donald Trump

Conservative Treehouse

The BEST ProTrump motivational video ever #TrumpFanNetwork

The Most Explosive WikiLeaks Clinton Revelations (So Far)

 

 Here is a rundown of some of the biggest bombshells dropped by WikiLeaks’ disclosure of Hillary Clinton’s speeches and emails, and why each is so important.

1. Clinton dreams of a world with “open trade and open borders”: Every American should understand that Democrats, and plenty of Republicans, are fighting an all-out war against national sovereignty. Sure, Democrats want new voters, and Republican interests want cheap labor, but they also share a mutual desire to increase the distance between the Ruling Class and voters. In the globalist future, political and business titans will stand atop the world, without having to worry about fulfilling annoying duties to grubby little voters with nostalgic memories of the days when American politicians served America’s interests. Globalism means you’ll never be able to vote against anything.

2. Clinton courted business elites to support liberal agenda to beat back populism: Clinton’s speeches include numerous examples of something that’s hardly new, or unique to her, but a very important harbinger of things to come if she gets into the White House. Democrats serve their voters a steady stream of anti-business, anti-wealth rhetoric, but they’re keenly interested in using Big Business to promote the agenda of Big Government. Some of the examples in the leaked speeches, such as Clinton urging business interests to beat back the Tea Party and support open-borders immigration, are points of common interest with the GOP Establishment.

3. Clinton campaign coordinated with Super PAC: No one familiar with the WikiLeaks disclosures should be able to restrain their laughter when Hillary Clinton talks about getting “big money” and “dark money” out of politics. Then again, she should have been laughed off the stage for such tirades long before WikiLeaks started releasing her campaign’s emails.

4. Clinton admitted she has different “public and private positions” on Wall Street reform: Again, this shouldn’t surprise anyone, but it’s always useful to catch a politician actually admitting she isn’t honest with the public on issues – especially an issue of keen interest to the Democrats who opposed her in the primary. In the same issue, she admitted she’s out of touch with ordinary Americans and “far removed” from middle-class life, which is a refreshing bit of (unintended) candor from such a sanctimonious candidate and Party. Lastly, she said it was an “oversimplification” to blame banks for the 2008 financial meltdown, which is true – and greatly understating the truth of Democrat politicians’ culpability, at that – but not at all what Democrat hyper-partisans want to hear from their leaders.

5. Clinton campaign asked about using White House executive privilege to hide emails from Congress: “Think we should hold emails to and from POTUS? That’s the heart of his exec privilege. We could get them to ask for that,” John Podesta – current Clinton campaign chair, and former White House counsel – wrote to Hillary’s aide Cheryl Mills, even as the House Benghazi Committee was writing a subpoena for Clinton’s long-hidden correspondence. It’s absolutely shocking that Team Clinton would think Barack Obama was willing to abuse executive privilege to hide vital information from Congress. Wherever did they get that outrageous idea?

6. Clinton campaign looked for political support from “needy Latinos”: This is the perfect example of an email chain that would set the media on fire, if it came from a Republican political campaign. They seem to have been talking about Latino politicians who were needy, rather than herds of Latino voters, but they were colorfully insulting to some of those politicians.

7. Collusion with State Department on managing Clinton’s email scandal: It’s pretty clear from these emails that Clinton’s team knew she broke the law, but they were (justifiably) confident they could trump the rule of law with politics… and plenty of help from their good friends in the Obama Administration. Other emails illustrate the Clinton team’s conviction that all Democrat scandals can be overcome with distractions and delaying tactics, counting on that 90% Democrat media to be easily distracted, and to stay quiet while stonewalls are constructed. You will see more collusion and stonewalling in future Democrat Administrations, building on the precedents Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton established. The next Republican Administration that tries it will get a swift and brutal lesson in why scandal management only works when the administrative state and media support the party in power.

8. “Journalists” secretly working as enthusiastic volunteers for Clinton/Kaine 2016: Another one to file under “no big surprise, but still nice to see it on paper.” The American public needs to understand there is no real division between the government and media when a Democrat is in the White House, especially with this particular Democrat. The press loved Barack Obama and was childishly easy for him to spin at will, even during the queasy Fifty Shades of Grey stages of their romantic relationship, but the press is Hillary Clinton’s campaign. They’re her donors, Clinton Foundation contributors, and often her former (and future!) employees. If you didn’t think the media could be less interested in holding a president accountable than Obama, you’re in for a shock if Clinton wins.

9. Planting the “seeds of revolution” in the “Middle Ages dictatorship” of the Catholic Church: Democrats view Christians in almost exactly the terms they adamantly refuse to apply to Islamic supremacists. They’re also very determined to infiltrate institutions that resist liberalism, subverting them from within, and destroying them if they refuse to be subverted. Check out the latest news about the National Football League for another example.

10. Clinton Cash panicked the campaign: They knew how bad this stuff was, and they wasted no time devising strategies to spin it away. They didn’t have much trouble convincing the press to stop bugging Clinton about the galaxy of Clinton Foundation scandals, did they? With Republicans, the media works hard to set up denials that look uncomfortable, or which they think can be demolished by later revelations. With Democrats, not so much.

11. Flip-flopping on TPP: It’s amazing than a single Sanders voter ever believed Clinton was honest about opposing the Trans-Pacific Partnership, but evidently most of them did, or else they never really cared about the issue as much as they claimed to. Leaked emails reveal how Clinton was not “comfortable” with attacking the trade deal she once gushed over as the “gold standard” for such agreements, but she knew she had to pretend to oppose it to placate union bosses and woo the Sanderistas. Clinton campaign staff talked about her “integrity” as though it were a stack of poker chips, deeming it reasonable to sacrifice a little integrity to keep the Sanders insurrection under control.

12. Gun control: cherry-picked data and executive orders: Democrats are going to lose patience with voter opposition to their gun control agenda and begin imposing it, as soon as they no longer have to worry about losing a tough election in the near future. They often worry about the potential backlash from Democrat voters in key states who support gun rights, but they’ll stop worrying about that soon, especially if Clinton does extremely well in those states. A packed Supreme Court will make her even bolder about chipping away at the Second Amendment. No one should be surprised that Democrats like to pick and choose which crimes the public should focus upon, in order to sell the gun control agenda.

13. Special favors for “Friends of Bill” in Haiti: The Clintons’ use of Haiti as a cash machine was disgusting. The hypocrisy of liberals willing to ignore this carnival of corruption, at the expense of an impoverished black nation, to slip the Clintons back into the White House is unbearable. The corruption of the State Department into a wholly owned subsidiary of Clinton, Inc. should be completely unacceptable.

14. Iran nuclear deal was “greatest appeasement since Chamberlain gave Czechoslovakia to Hitler”: This email chain quotes Republican Senator Mark Kirk of Illinois saying Obama’s nuclear deal “condemns the next generation to cleaning up a nuclear war in the Persian Gulf,” and Clinton campaign chief John Podesta responding, “Yup.” While the Democrats figure out how to spin that away, the rest of us can reflect that Clinton, Podesta, and other old hands in her inner circle probably have significant differences of opinion with Barack Obama and his teenage-punk approach to foreign policy. Obama and his weird little gang of young advisers thought it would be a great idea to do the opposite of everything his predecessors did, Republican and Democrat alike. The Clinton group worked in one of those preceding Administrations. However, Mrs. Clinton and all of her loyal retainers were willing to stifle their objections to Obama’s foreign policy in the name of party loyalty… even when those objections hinted at a future nuclear war.

15. Clinton wanted to run against Donald Trump in 2016: The three Republican candidates Clinton’s campaign thought they had the best chance of beating were Trump, Ben Carson, and Senator Ted Cruz. “We need to be elevating the Pied Piper candidates so that they are leaders of the pack and tell the press to them seriously,” said a memo sent to the Democratic National Committee. They were quite confident of their ability to tell the press which Republican candidates it should take seriously.

16. Clinton knew Libya was a disaster: Her hindsight about the bloody, world-destabilizing fallout from the overthrow of Qaddafi, and the inability of the new Libyan government to provide security for Americans, was 20/20… but what good does that do anyone, especially the Americans who died in Benghazi? It’s laughable to hear Clinton and her supporters brag about her great resume. Her resume is the world outside your window, and what she says about it to her big donors is very different from what she says to the general public.

17. “Foreign govt donors: all the money is in”: The Clinton team is much more relaxed about discussing big bucks from overseas among themselves. They don’t want the public thinking about how much support Clinton gets from foreign interests, or dwelling on how unsavory some of those interests are. They were reluctant to disclose all of those foreign donors to the Obama Administration as they promised. But the leaked emails show they’re very well aware of how important that imported cash is. This particular email seems to concern locking down foreign financial support for the Clinton Foundation, in case Mrs. and Mr. Clinton find themselves back in the White House next year.

18. Clinton Foundation audit reveals it may have misled the IRS: One of the perks of Clintonhood is that you can file taxes incorrectly, suffer no penalties whatsoever, and refile the paperwork years later. A 2011 audit of the Clinton Foundation requested by Chelsea Clinton discovered that, despite sworn statements to the IRS, the Foundation didn’t write or enforce the required conflict-of-interest policy… and, wouldn’t you know it, some conflicts of interest do seem to have cropped up! Two years later, long after Hillary Clinton resigned as Secretary of State, gift acceptance policies were still a work in progress.

Breitbart

The Most Powerful Anti-Hillary Ad Yet Was Released And It Just Changed Everything

The Bill and Hillary Clinton Complete Body Count