December 25, 2010 
By Ron Hunnicutt
Progressives delight in proclaiming that God is not mentioned in the Constitution. But the Declaration of Independence does mention our Creator in the first two paragraphs along with the last. Our Declaration is the why of what our Founding Fathers did. The Constitution is the how. The Declaration is the foundation, and the Constitution is the structure or framework of our government. The Declaration is act one, and the Constitution is act two. Both acts make for a viable construct. Leave one or the other out, and the whole becomes incoherent.
By Ron Hunnicutt
Progressives delight in proclaiming that God is not mentioned in the Constitution. But the Declaration of Independence does mention our Creator in the first two paragraphs along with the last. Our Declaration is the why of what our Founding Fathers did. The Constitution is the how. The Declaration is the foundation, and the Constitution is the structure or framework of our government. The Declaration is act one, and the Constitution is act two. Both acts make for a viable construct. Leave one or the other out, and the whole becomes incoherent.
What  is the purpose of the Constitution?  To set up a government that  acknowledges our equality in God's eyes (and yes, the equality stops  right there, except for the idea that all men should have equality  before the law in a courtroom) and allows us to exercise our  "unalienable rights," among other things.  The Declaration states our  independence from tyranny, and so the obvious need for the Constitution  is at hand.
If  progressives wish to discount our Declaration or discount God's  presence in the Declaration, then the purpose of our very existence as a  nation becomes somewhat confused.  The Founders created a  constitutional republic, but why?  For what purpose?  The Declaration  gives the why and purpose.  A part of the Founders' justification for  declaring independence was that King George III "broke covenant" with  the colonists for many reasons, and "covenant" is a sober biblical  concept.
Just  so that we are clear about all of these matters, most Christians do not  advocate a theocracy, although progressives delight in announcing  otherwise.  It's just that the liberal construct of "separation of  church and state" has mutated into state-enforced atheism.  The First  Amendment says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment  of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof[.]"  It is about  Congress!  Not the people!  It does not say that Christians cannot  influence or be involved in government.  It does not say that God has to  be removed from anything government has its tentacles in.  It does not  say that the ACLU can remove a Christian symbol at will or with the  threat of litigation.  Progressives have used the ruse of "separation of  church and state," which is not in the Constitution, to rabidly attack  everything Christian.  Christians should have as much influence in our  culture and on our government as anyone else.  Behind every law is some  sort of value, and the source of that value is vital.
Now,  here is another item of galactic importance in our Declaration.  Here  is what it says: that men are "endowed by their Creator with certain  unalienable rights[.]"  Those rights, "life, liberty and the pursuit of  happiness," are from God Himself, not from governments or government  leaders.  So the Declaration is a most vital statement by the Founders.   The importance of this cannot be overemphasized.  To an atheist leader  like Stalin, Lenin, Mao or Hitler, people have no God-given rights at  all. 
So  now we are at a vital point: most of the time, when someone removes God  from an equation, the result is confusion, dysfunction, and  incoherency.  Liberalism does this routinely and with reckless abandon.   It is incoherent to suggest that abortion does not snuff out a life.   It is incoherent to suggest that there is virtue in deficit spending.   It is incoherent to suggest that there is no God, and Hitler just died  and that's the end of it.
But  for most progressives, that incoherence is preferable to the difficulty  of having God in the equation.  If God is in the equation, then maybe  He has something to say about how I live and what I do.  He might very  well have some sort of claim on my very existence.
The Founding Fathers were an enlightened bunch, and they afforded God his proper place.  In the beginning...
 
 
