by
William Bigelow
The networks and the Associated Press have an insidious plan
to help President Obama on Election Day that is being swept under the
rug: they are cutting nineteen states from the list of exit polls they
will report. For twenty years, all 50 states have been reported, but
somehow this year the networks and AP are ignoring 19 of them. Now just
how and why were those 19 states selected?
The ostensible reason given is the rising cost of the surveys. Dan
Merkle, director of elections for ABC News, and a member of the
consortium that runs the polls, said the goal “is to still deliver a
quality product in the most important states.”
So just which states are being ignored? Alaska, Arkansas, Delaware,
District of Columbia, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana,
Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South
Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia and Wyoming.
The Washington Post tried to gloss over the scheme, noting
“how carefully the exit poll planners allocated resources. All 19 of the
states with no exit polls are classified as either “solid Obama” or
“solid Romney.”
Really? Of the nineteen states (including Washington, D.C.) exactly 4 are for Obama, with a total of 14 electoral votes. The fifteen Romney states add up to 135.
It is utter hogwash that the exit polls were cut from these states
because they were in the bag for one of the candidates. If Texas is cut,
how about New York and California?
The real reason the consortium has cut these states is that they know
that if they report fifteen states coming in for Romney early,
independent voters in other states will take notice and be swayed his
way.
There is no way that the networks and AP can rationalize their
decision without damning themselves with their obvious partisanship. In
2008, the major media outlets were in the tank and lined up for Obama,
but it was done under the radar. Now it’s all-encompassing. They are
goose-stepping in public.
Big Journalism